Advertisement

Science Friday
Hogan’s noise
A cosmologist suggests a novel way to uncover the nature of spacetime on the smallest scales
font_down font_up Text Size
access
His noiseCosmologist Craig Hogan is proposing that the universe is a hologram made of tiny grains, or pixels, of spacetime. Photo: Fermilab; illustration: T. Dube

Oh, the noise!

Oh, the noise! Noise! Noise! Noise!

That’s the one thing he hated!

The NOISE! NOISE! NOISE! NOISE!

— Dr. Seuss, How the Grinch Stole Christmas

The Grinch detested the noise created by the tiny residents of Whoville. Cosmologist Craig Hogan, in contrast, has become enamored of a noise he claims is generated by something even tinier — a minuscule graininess in the otherwise smooth structure of spacetime.

access
Projecting spacetimeAccording to the holographic principle as envisioned by Craig Hogan, each grain of information encoded on a surface (left) becomes larger when seen by an observer a great distance away, just as the graininess inherent in a movie is magnified when projected onto a big screen. Courtesy of C. Hogan, illustration by T. Dube

Call it Hogan’s noise. Many physicists are skeptical, but if his hunch about the existence of this subatomic clatter proves correct, it could have a mind-boggling implication: that the entire universe is nothing more than a giant hologram.

What’s more, it would mean that the structure of spacetime on subatomic scales might soon be revealed. “What’s new is that we can make a prediction and design an experiment to measure something on the tiniest of scales in the universe, and that’s what hasn’t been done before,” says Hogan, director of the Fermilab Center for Particle Astrophysics in Batavia, Ill., and a researcher at the University of Chicago.

In fact, it’s just possible that a detector in Hannover, Germany, built for an entirely different study, may have already recorded the noise generated by the smallest units of spacetime in the universe.

But Hogan’s model would go even deeper than that. It could lead to a major revision in how scientists think about spacetime, says theorist Bernard Schutz, director of the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics in Potsdam, Germany. Hogan’s hypothesis suggests that information encoded on a tiny piece of spacetime could somehow influence the amount of information available to an observer from a region far, far away — violating a principle of physics known as locality. Rejecting locality would have major implications for attempts to knit together the quantum world — the subatomic realm — with Einstein’s general theory of relativity, which deals with gravity and the structure of spacetime on the very largest cosmic scales.

In most models that try to apply quantum theory to spacetime, the universe is indeed grainy, Schutz notes. But that graininess is usually the same everywhere in the cosmos. In contrast, Hogan’s model suggests the graininess isn’t uniform. It gets amplified the farther an observer resides from grains in a remote region of spacetime. That concept “would be a major revolution” in quantum gravity research, Schutz says.

Holographic pixels

access
Feel the noiseSpacetime in Hogan's model is represented as waves (vertical lines show wave fronts) traveling in one direction (blue arrows). The waves spread (middle panel) because of uncertainty in their momentum predicted by quantum theory. This uncertainty may be measurable as noise, or jitter (bottom panel). Courtesy of C. Hogan, illustration by T. Dube

Physicists often describe spacetime as “pixelated,” or carved up into tiny, indivisible units with a length of only about 10-35 meters — one ten-trillionth of a trillionth the diameter of a hydrogen atom. That’s much too small to be detected directly in any experiment. Or so most people have assumed. 

Hogan combines the idea of pixelated spacetime with the notion, borrowed from string theory and quantum mechanics, that the universe is equivalent to a hologram. That notion holds that a surface enclosing a volume of space encodes all the information contained in that volume. Just as the hologram imprinted on a credit card reveals a third dimension, so too does an imaginary surface in spacetime appear to create an extra dimension.

The position of every particle in space is represented in quantum theory by a wave function, a mathematical formula for describing the probability that the particle has a particular location. In Hogan’s model, each grain of spacetime can be thought of as having a wave function associated with it, making spacetime fuzzy. (The fuzziness means that the position of a particle can only be known as precisely as the length of each grain.)

Each grain is much too small to measure. But as a wave travels through space, it interferes with waves from adjacent grains (adjacent patches of spacetime), producing an interference pattern — a band of light and dark fringes — that on a distant screen is large enough to be measured.

In Hogan’s model, the larger the hologram, the larger the interference pattern. If the hologram is big enough, the traveling waves produce a kind of macro-scopic jitter, or noise, which could be recorded with a relatively inexpensive experiment, Hogan asserts.

He and his colleague Mark Jackson, now at Leiden University in the Netherlands, described their ideas last year in Physical Review D. Hogan has also posted his latest work online on arXiv.org

access
Holographic twist According to physicist Juan Maldacena's holographic principle, a theory of gravity in a particular 5-D model of spacetime (right) called anti-de Sitter space is equivalent to a theory without gravity in a 4-D flat spacetime. Illustration by Jason Torchinsky/From Eternity to Here by Sean Carroll

If Hogan is right, he has made a breakthrough in understanding the quantum world. Despite decades of effort, physicists have not yet successfully melded quantum theory with gravity, an essential step in forming a complete theory of the universe. Since the 1950s, scientists have managed to develop complete quantum versions of the other three known forces in nature — the electromagnetic force; the strong force, which binds protons and neutrons together; and the weak interaction, which is responsible for certain kinds of radioactive decay. Gravity is the last holdout.

Most attempts to quantize gravity assume the existence of quantum fields that obey the concept of locality, which holds that an event in one region can affect only what happens in an adjacent region. A change in an electric field in one region of space, for instance, affects only fields in an adjacent region. But Hogan’s model suggests that theorists should seriously consider a quantum theory of gravity in which two very different regions of spacetime, despite their vast separation, can still profoundly influence each other, Schutz notes.

But like many physicists, Schutz says he is skeptical about the details of Hogan’s model, which appears to be mainly conceptual. Hogan, for his part, readily admits his model is not fundamental — it doesn’t explain why there is a fundamental unit of length, for instance — but it predicts a specific type of noise that could be verified by experiments.

“One thing that Hogan emphasizes in his papers is that he is providing phenomenology rather than underlying theory” about holography, spacetime and information, says theorist Christopher Herzog of Princeton University.

Black illusions

Gravity was first theoretically linked to information in the 1970s, when Stephen Hawking of the University of Cambridge in England and Jacob Bekenstein, now at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, realized that there was a deep relationship between thermodynamics, which is the study of heat transport, and black holes. According to the second law of thermodynamics, the entropy of a system — a measure related to the amount of information it holds — cannot decrease over time. Hawking showed that for that to be true, a black hole must increase its entropy by an amount greater than the entropy carried by a body that falls into the hole.

access
Detecting noiseScientists have detected small, unaccounted-for motion in GEO600's beam splitter (shown), some of which may have come from Hogan's proposed noise. Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (AEI/Leibniz Universitat Hannover)

Bekenstein calculated that the entropy of a black hole is entirely determined by its effective surface area, or event horizon, not its volume. The event horizon is the imaginary surface that surrounds a black hole and marks the point of no return: Any entity — be it a planet or a string quartet — that gets closer to the hole than the event horizon is doomed to fall in.

In the 1990s, two scientists dramatically extended this idea into a “holographic principle” that states that a volume of space can be entirely described by what happens on its boundary. Nobel laureate Gerard ’t Hooft of the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands first proposed the idea. Stanford physicist Leonard Susskind then gave the idea a more precise description according to the precepts of string theory, which holds that each elementary particle can be represented by tiny, vibrating snippets of string in nine or 10 dimensions of space, rather than the usual three.

Applying the holographic principle to the real world has proven challenging. It can be difficult to relate a theory about a volume of space with, say, five dimensions, to a simpler theory that envisions a universe that is restricted to the boundary, or surface, of that volume — a universe with one less dimension. But in 1997, Juan Maldacena, now at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J., used string theory to show that in one model, there truly is a one-to-one correspondence between the description of a volume of space in a higher dimensional theory that includes gravity and a lower dimensional theory — the boundary of that space — in which gravity plays no role.

Consider, once again, Hogan’s proposed holographic surface. It’s made of tiles that each have a length, about 10-35 meters, equal to a fundamental unit known as the Planck length, named for Max Planck, the father of quantum theory. The information encoded on the surface corresponds to the number of Planck tiles covering that surface.

According to the holographic principle, the information on the surface must be exactly the same as that contained within the volume. But that can be true only if the volume is much grainier, or blurrier, than the Planck-length tiles on the surface. In other words, the tiles that fill the volume are much bigger than those on the surface. Effectively, the blurriness of the information encoded on the surface becomes magnified within the volume enclosed by the hologram.

Hogan calls this magnification “the holographic uncertainty principle.” He sees it as an extension of the uncertainty principle proposed by German physicist Werner Heisenberg in 1927. Heisenberg famously noted that the position and momentum of a subatomic particle cannot both be precisely measured at the same time.

access
The detectorThe GEO600 experiment in Germany may be able to detect a jitter in spacetime by picking up sideways motion in a beam splitter that divides one laser beam into two. The beams then travel down perpendicular arms (shown) 600 meters long. Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (AEI/Leibniz Universitat Hannover)

“I think Hogan must see himself as a sort of latter-day Heisenberg,” says Herzog. “Just as Heisenberg provided us with an uncertainty principle without a full-fledged theory of quantum mechanics, Hogan is hoping that his holographic uncertainty principle will be a similarly important result in a full theory of quantum gravity.”

This larger size of the tiles within the volume becomes noticeable only at very large distances from the holographic surface, Hogan notes. A sensitive device that could measure changes in length in two perpendicular directions at large distances from the surface might therefore be sensitive to this fundamental limit of encoding information, he says.

That ought to put a smile on the face of scientists trying to uncover and comprehend the smallest units of spacetime. But not everyone is convinced.

Theorist Maldacena notes that “theories of quantum mechanical spacetime, such as string theory, are constructed so that they respect the symmetries of spacetime, such as the symmetries of special relativity.” In contrast, he says, Hogan’s proposal violates one of the foundations of special relativity, namely that lengths (and time) are not absolute quantities but contract or expand in such a way that the speed of light always has the same numerical value, regardless of the speed of an observer.

Hogan agrees that his theory of holographic noise does indeed violate special relativity. But he adds that relativity theory does not take into account the quantum nature of spacetime. Some as-yet-unknown symmetry of quantum gravity is likely to supersede some of the concepts of special relativity, which might break down on the tiniest of subatomic scales, he asserts.

Because of this violation, Hogan’s model is not consistent with the holographic ideas in string theory, Maldacena insists. “So it would be more accurate to call his noise ‘Hogan’s noise,’” he says.

Regardless of what it’s called, this new kind of noise brings together elements of several previous ideas, as Hogan acknowledges. In 1999, Giovanni Amelino-Camelia, now at the University of Rome La Sapienza, published a study suggesting that quantum-gravity noise might show up in large-scale experiments.

Noisy experiments

Indeed, Hogan is hoping that two experiments — one ongoing, the other in the planning stages — may find evidence for the quantum clatter.

Since 2002, a British-German apparatus called GEO600 has been searching for the notes of a cosmic symphony — ripples in spacetime known as gravitational waves — that general relativity says ought to exist. Such waves should be generated any time a dense body, such as a neutron star or black hole, is accelerated.

The experiment, based in Hannover, Germany, hasn’t found any of these waves. But part of the signal that GEO600 has detected might be accounted for by holographic noise, Hogan says. 

GEO600, like some other gravitational wave detectors, uses laser light to measure tiny changes in the relative lengths of two perpendicular arms of an interferometer. A gravitational wave would alternately expand one arm ever so slightly while compressing the other. GEO600 uses a single laser beam, split into two beams by a half-silvered mirror, to measure and compare the two lengths.

Because of the experiment’s design, GE0600 is much more sensitive to the sideways motion of the beam splitter than are other large gravitational wave detectors. And an unexplained sideways motion of the beam splitter is just “the effect claimed by Hogan as a consequence of his holographic noise,” says GEO600 principal investigator Karsten Danzmann of the Leibniz Universität Hannover.

In fact, about a year ago, Danzmann and his colleagues thought an unexplained noise that GEO600 had recorded could be Hogan’s noise. However, most of the instrumental noise recorded at relatively low frequencies — from a few hundred hertz to over 1,000 hertz — has now been accounted for by known sources within the detector, says Danzmann. “But the uncertainty in our noise is still large enough to accommodate a signal as predicted by Craig Hogan,” he adds.

Hogan’s noise is predicted to have the same strength at all frequencies, and Danzmann’s team is now analyzing motion of the beam splitter recorded at higher frequencies. Within a year, the team should know whether its findings support Hogan’s prediction.

“Hogan gets to the point of ‘predicting’ … the actual magnitude of the ‘noise anomaly’ seen at GEO600,” says Amelino-Camelia. “The reason why I essentially stopped working on my quantum-gravity noise proposal was that indeed I couldn’t find any way to really get a robust intuition for the magnitude one should or could expect for this noise.”

But even if GEO600 finds a jitter that resembles the noise that Hogan predicts, it will take a much more sensitive experiment to prove the fuzzy, holographic nature of spacetime, says Schutz.

Such an experiment is now in the planning stages at Fermilab, Hogan says. The proposed $2-million apparatus would feature a pair of interferometers, each with perpendicular arms 40 meters in length. Initially, the two experiments would be placed next to each other, testing a key prediction of Hogan’s theory: The noise recorded by two adjacent devices ought to be correlated.

“They move together because the whole of spacetime they are sitting in is jittering around,” says Hogan. If one device records a type of motion that might be attributed to quantum jitter but the other device does not, Hogan’s theory would be ruled out.

But if the noise is detected, the next test would be to move the two interferometers farther apart. At large separation, the correlation between the amount of noise in the two detectors should shrink to zero according to Hogan’s model, says Stephan Meyer of the University of Chicago.

If it all works, the experiment could give a first glimpse of the tiniest scraps of spacetime. But whether Hogan’s noise will be revealed, only time — make that spacetime — will tell.


Found in: Astronomy and Physics

Comments 8
  • If Hogan is correct, the ramifications will be far reaching indeed.

    However, assume we have a thermodynamically closed system, and I mean a system that is completely isolated. The possibility of pockets of ordered information or ordered structures can still occur at the expense of order in other locations. Certian atomic or molecular configurations can come about such as crystal growth etc, or analogous processes can be manifest. Afterall, the disorder in the universe is increasing but we have great pockets of highly organized matter such as the huge set the elements within Earth's biosphere.

    Thus, just because the maximum information content within a Planck level space tiled closed surface may thus be represented does not necessarilly indicate the temporal step by step instantaneous rate of re-ordering of the thermodynamic potential within the enclosed volume can be so determined.

    For instance, we might assume that a surface encloses our Earth, which represent the potential thermodynamic information content within the sphere at one instant, but then in time periods of femtoseconds, atomic bondings and de-bondings can occur as well as a whole host of other microscopic effects that do not have time to register within the imaginary Planck lengthed space tiled holographic surface. All of the potential statistical mechanical states may be known from the holographic principle in theory, but the specific temporal distribution of the quantumm mechanical information may not be recoverable from the surrounding 2-D holographic surface. All it takes is just one random but specifc zero point field jitter within an atom to change the ordering of statistical mechanical states within the system.

    Also, the effects of zero point vacuum fluctuations might need to be taken into account. Eventhough many physicists might balk at such a notion because zero point virtual particles are not real particles, they are nonetheless ontologically real as well as lexocographically real otherwise they would have no name and mathematics by which they could be denotable and defined, not to mention being incorporated into quantum field theory models of the virtual bosonic particle based transmission of each of the four known forces.

    The timewise progression of virtual particle distributions within a holographic quantum gravity based theory might thus also need to be taken into account.
    James  Essig James Essig
    Feb. 26, 2010 at 5:38pm
  • Physicists often describe spacetime as “pixelated,” or carved up into tiny, indivisible units with a length of only about 10-35 meters — one ten-trillionth of a trillionth the diameter of a hydrogen atom.

    Wow, that's a big atom....
    Fred Schroeder Fred Schroeder
    Feb. 26, 2010 at 6:38pm
  • I do not think that experimental refutation of the above quantum holographic information principle would necessarily involve the possibility of non-locality especially in terms of superluminal signal and energy transmission.

    First, assuming one is located a small portion of the distance of the radius of an imaginary sphere enclosing a region of space time and any real mattergy contents within, the first measurement that could be made with respect to the sphere is to measure or detect the state of the closest Planck space time unit(s) which would necessarily need to occur through a classical information channel at speed less than or equal to C. But as time progressed, progressively more distant Planck Space or Planck Space time surface elements could be scanned or measured. However, by the time one measured the most distant of such units on the opposite side of the imaginary sphere, the instantaneous state of the sphere would have changed thus requiring re-measurement of the closest section of the sphere and then progressively more distant locations of the sphere, and the same situation and process would repeat itself over and over again, thus at the very least preventing a measurement of the states within the sphere with non-trivial fidelity.

    Second, we assume that the maximum entropy of a 3 –D enclosed volume of space is proportional to the square of the radius of the solid spherical enclosed volume as opposed to being equal to the cube of the radius, but this only implies that as the entropy goes up, so does the quantity of possible thermodynamic states, and that the number of Planck space units that need to be scanned goes up in direct proportion to the square of the increase in the radius of the sphere, thus resulting in the need for the number of measurements going up in proportion to the increase in maximal entropy of the 3-D enclosed volume.

    Third, even assuming that the sphere is very small and that we are very close to the sphere so that the time difference between light speed travel from the closest portion of the sphere with respect to that from the most distant portion of the sphere is miniscule, then we must reconcile with the fact that small systems can undergo holistic changes within much faster than much larger systems. So even though the travel time of light to the observer from the closest differential spherical element might be but a small fraction of the travel time of light from the far end of the sphere, the absolute difference in travel time although very small, still permits the state of the space time and any mass energy within the sphere to evolve, and then so in a rapid manner before a complete set of measurements are made. The interior of the sphere will change even as a given set of the measurements are be performed.

    Fourthly, assuming we are located at a much greater distance away from the sphere then the radius of the sphere would still entail a need to measure the near end of the sphere first followed by progressive measurements of the ever more distant spherical elements. In the limit that the radius of the sphere was 1/infinity or perhaps even 1/ensemble of the distance between the observer and the sphere, the measurements taken from the near end of a sphere of a given radius would still be lagged by the same absolute time differential by the measurement of the most distant space time surface area element. However, the ratio of the light travel time from the near end of the sphere with respect to the light travel time from the far end of the sphere would be exactly one for infinite travel distances, and still virtually equal to one for even short finite distances. Thus, one would not gain much if measurement of the near end of the sphere could somehow be used to glean the totality of information within the sphere in terms of superluminal information communication. Due to any uncertainty in the speed of light such as some sort of additional uncertainty principle, trivial superluminal information transmission in this case would not violate the principle of the classical locality of the light speed limit of information and energy transmission, at least not in spirit.

    Note, that even all known schemes of quantum information and quantum energy teleportation require a classical feedback channel for the exchange loop to be closed. In short, as far as we can tell, quantum teleportation cannot be used to send a signal faster than C or to transmit energy faster than C.

    Fifth, the ability to detect space time units within the sphere via the signal they produce does not mean that faster than light speed communication has occurred, after all, we can observe and measure entangled systems of bosons or fermions even though classical channels are required to make the observations.

    For those looking for a sense of intrigue regarding any proposed superluminal or non-local effects from the above experiments, if they exist, more power to you, but in the event that the speed of light in vacuu proves to be an absolutely insurmountable limit for information and energy transmission through space, the mystery of why such is the case, may be far more profound and intriguing than any superluminal travel through space.

    Suppose that we are somehow able to reach the speed of light in our space craft or in our daily living infrastructure as a distant future interstellar and intergalactic space faring civilization, what will we discover? Is there some new realm, dimension, or kinematical spatial temporal reality just waiting to be entered if we can reach C exactly? What happens to the order and integrity of cause and effect for inertial massive reference frames somehow able to reach C exactly? The caveats to exactly light speed travel through space are many not to mention the biggest ones of mustering the infinite energies required, and somehow cloaking such infinite space craft kinetic energy from the surrounding universe so as to not trash the space craft nor the universe in which it travels at exactly C.
    James  Essig James Essig
    Feb. 26, 2010 at 10:11pm
  • 10-35 Meters? A type setters error, should be 10 to the -35th, a small number indeed.
    David  Gorthy David Gorthy
    Feb. 28, 2010 at 10:31am
  • I have long speculated that the speed of light may be the ratio of the smallest space dimension (or s=space quanta) to the smallest time dimension (t=time quanta). C=s/t. If something went faster than c, say 3c, it would traverse a single space quanta in a third of a time quanta, but by definition, a time quanta cannot be subdivided. (By the same token this model predicts nothing can go slower than the speed of light; this paradox may be explained by wave motion: objects do not travel in a straight line.)

    With a model of space-time quanta the 'holographic principle' should come as no surprise. That "a volume of space can be entirely described by what happens on its boundary" follows from realizing that for the minimally sized space-time particle there can be no inside. It is all surface. If there was an inside then a smaller particle than the postulated smallest particle would exist. This, of course, is a contradiction.

    Light travels across space-time in a series of discrete steps. A ticking clock is not a bad model for this.

    Simcha Pollack, St. John's University
    Simcha Pollack Simcha Pollack
    Mar. 2, 2010 at 7:27pm
  • Very poorly written. Standard journalistic practice used to summarize the story in the first sentence -- who, what, when, where, why, how. But Science News's style book apparently *requires* at least two puns and silly metaphors in the early paragraphs. Guess you can't discuss science without being childish.

    This story takes the cake. Cowen does not even try to explain anything until the seventh paragraph. (If I did not have a strong interest in the foundations of physics, I would never have got that far.)

    After reading the story twice (and consulting Wikipedia for related concepts like Planck length) I am still confused. I get the distinct impression that Cowen is confused.
    Solo Owl Solo Owl
    Mar. 7, 2010 at 12:03pm
  • Karamursel Haber
    Kerim uygun Kerim uygun
    Mar. 8, 2010 at 7:38pm
  • "...Craig Hogan is proposing that the universe is a hologram..."
    sounds like Mr.Hogan has come up with an original idea.
    an original idea? not quite...
    you see, this is what happens when media does not do their research - a statement is made and people take it for fact.
    read: The Holographic Universe [Micheal Talbot] published in 1991.
    The Holographic Universe is based on the research of Stanford neurophysiologist Karl H. Pribram and University of London quantum physicist David Bohm, one of the world's most respected quantum physicists. Bohm was an assistant professor at Princeton University, where he worked closely with Einstein.
    Bohm made a number of significant contributions to physics, particularly in the area of quantum mechanics and relativity theory. Bohm's first book "Quantum Theory" (1951) was well-received by Einstein, among others.
    The synthesis of Bohm and Pribram's views has come to be called the Holographic Paradigm.

    In 1982, physicists (Alain Aspect, Jean Dalibard, Gerard Roger) at the Institute of Theoretical and Applied Optics in Paris, led a research team and demonstrated that the web of subatomic particles that compose our physical universe - the very fabric of reality itself - possesses what appears to be an undeniable "holographic" property.

    You may want to look up the research of David Bohm and Karl H. Pribram on Wikipedia. Hogan is far from the first to propose a holographic universe.

    --
    "Nothing would be what it is. Because everything would be what it isn't.
    And contray wise, what it is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?"
    (Alice in Wonderland)
    CoryTek CoryTek
    Mar. 9, 2010 at 12:24am
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.

Advertisement
Citations & References :
seperator
  • Links to Craig Hogan’s publications: [Go to]
  • Hogan, C J. Holographic noise in interferometers [Go to]
  • Hogan, CJ., and M.G. Jackson. 2009. Holographic geometry and noise in matrix theory. Physical Review D 79:124009. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.124009. [Go to]
  • Hogan, C.J. Indeterminacy of holographic quantum geometry. Physical Review D 78:087501. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.087501. [Go to]
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator