- :: Atom & Cosmos
- :: Body & Brain
- :: Earth
- :: Environment
- :: Genes & Cells
- :: Humans
- :: Life
- :: Matter & Energy
- :: Molecules
- :: Science & Society
- :: Other Topics
- :: Science News For Kids
Dead men can indeed tell tales, but they speak in a whispered double helix.
Consider an older gentleman whose skeleton lay in one of more than 200 tombs recently excavated at a 2,000-year-old cemetery in eastern Mongolia, near China’s northern border. DNA extracted from this man’s bones pegs him as a descendant of Europeans or western Asians. Yet he still assumed a prominent position in ancient Mongolia’s Xiongnu Empire, say geneticist Kyung-Yong Kim of Chung-Ang University in Seoul, South Korea, and his colleagues.
On the basis of previous excavations and descriptions in ancient Chinese texts, researchers suspect that the Xiongnu Empire — which ruled a vast territory in and around Mongolia from 209 B.C. to A.D. 93 — included ethnically and linguistically diverse nomadic tribes. The Xiongnu Empire once ruled the major trading route known as the Asian Silk Road, opening it to both Western and Chinese influences.
Researchers have yet to pin down the language spoken by Xiongnu rulers and political elites, says archaeologist David Anthony of Hartwick College in Oneonta, N.Y. But the new genetic evidence shows that the 2,000-year-old man “was multi-ethnic, like the Xiongnu polity itself,” Anthony remarks.
This long-dead individual possessed a set of genetic mutations on his Y chromosome, which is inherited from paternal ancestors, that commonly appears today among male speakers of Indo-European languages in eastern Europe, central Asia and northern India, Kim’s team reports in an upcoming American Journal of Physical Anthropology. The same man displayed a pattern of mitochondrial DNA mutations, inherited from maternal ancestors, characteristic of speakers of modern Indo-European languages in central Asia, the researchers say.
“We don’t know if this 60- to 70-year-old man reached Mongolia on his own or if his family had already lived there for many generations,” says study coauthor Charles Brenner, a DNA analyst based in Oakland, Calif.
Two other skeletons from the Xiongnu cemetery in Duurlig Nars show genetic links to people who live in northeastern Asia, according to Kim’s team. Other team members include Kijeong Kim of Chung-Ang University and Eregzen Gelegdorj of the National Museum of Mongolia in Ulaanbaatar.
The Duurlig Nars man’s genetic signature supports the idea that Indo-European migrations to northeastern Asia started before 2,000 years ago. This notion is plausible, but not confirmed, says geneticist Peter Underhill of Stanford University. Further investigations of Y chromosome mutation frequencies in modern populations will allow for a more precise tracing of the Duurlig Nars man’s geographic roots, Underhill predicts.
Scholars have long sought to trace the origin and spread of related languages now found in Europe, India and other parts of Asia. One hypothesis holds that Indo-European languages proliferated via several waves of expansion and conquest by nomads known as Kurgans who had domesticated horses and thus could travel long distances. In this scenario, Kurgans left a homeland north of the Black Sea, in what’s now Russia, around 6,400 years ago.
Another view holds that farmers from ancient Turkey spread Indo-European tongues as they swallowed up one parcel of land after another, beginning around 9,000 years ago.
Since 1978, discoveries of 2,400- to 4,000-year-old mummified corpses with European features in northwestern China, not far from Mongolia, have fueled the Kurgan hypothesis (SN: 2/25/95, p. 120). Remains of large wheels found with these blond-haired individuals raise the controversial possibility that these foreigners introduced carts and chariots to the Chinese.
Add to those discoveries a report in the September 2009 Human Genetics. Geneticist Christine Keyser of the University of Strasbourg in France and her colleagues found that nine of 26 skeletons previously excavated at 11 Kurgan sites in northeastern Russia possess a Y chromosome mutation pattern thought to mark the eastward expansion of early Indo-Europeans. That same genetic signature characterizes the Duurlig Nars man.
By 2,000 years ago, the easternmost Indo-European languages were probably spoken in northwestern China, Anthony holds. So an Indo-European speaker could have aligned himself with Xiongnu political big shots and earned an eternal resting place in an elite Xiongnu cemetery, in his opinion.
Kim agrees. The Duurlig Nars man’s tomb lies close to the tomb of an especially high-ranking Xiongnu man whom he may have served in some way, he suggests.
Kim’s group plans to extract and study DNA from additional Duurlig Nars skeletons. For now, Anthony remarks, “this new study from Mongolia is important because it adds one more point of light to a largely dark prehistoric sky.”
Found in: Archaeology and Humans

- Underhill, P., et al. 2009. Separating the Post-Glacial coancestry of European and Asian Y chromosomes within haplogroup R1a. European Journal of Human Genetics. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2009.194.
- Bower, B. 1995. Indo-European pursuits. Science News 147(8):120.
- Keyser, C., et al. 2009. Ancient DNA provides new insights into the history of south Siberian Kurgan people. Human Genetics 126:395. doi:10.1007/s00439-009-0683-0.
- For more information on David Anthony’s research: [Go to]
- Kim, K., et al. 2010. A Western Eurasian Male Is Found in 2000-Year-Old Elite Xiongnu Cemetery in Northeast Mongolia. Am. J. Phys. Anthro. doi:10.1002/ajpa.21242.
- New data suggest a lighter Higgs
- Two is the magic number
- Researchers create global map of tree height
- Hole from on high
- Taming time travel



This article captured my attention for a personal reason. I am originally from Hungary, and this bit of news literally strikes home. Hungarians are very closely related to the Huns with whom they share the same language. For thousands of years, the Huns had a vast empire in Central Asia in the region that is now Mongolia/Northern China. They were referred to by the Chinese as "Xiongnu" (cf. vol. 110 of the Shi Ji by the Chinese historian Sima Qian). The Huns were more Caucasian than Asian in appearance and their language was a Ural-Altaic, more specifically Turkic language. Hun(garian) is an agglutanizing language, very different from Indo-European languages.
Reading about the various speculations and hypotheses of the scientists quoted above, one wonders why the members of the larger scinefitic community don't speak to one another. I am not an archeologist, but the "mystery" of this find does not puzzle me at all; knowing about my people's origins and history, it all makes sense. Perhaps if the scientists involved would talk to their Hungarian colleagues, it might help shed some light on this particular find. Who knows, they might even be able to read any runic insciptions on the objects found in these tombs. My language, unlike English, has changed very little over the millenia.
The Xiongnu, and related nomadic tribal people are an area worthy of study, but what little remains is in great danger of being erased, and misappropriated.
I can clearly recall a time when the typical, and debunked Indo-European, etc, speculations were de rigeur, and marred nearly every scientific inquiry into these diverse people. I certainly hope that it is not the case even now...
If I remember correctly, they were as old a 5500 yaers old (from up to 3500 BCE), and the speculated reason for these Cities abandonment was the complete melting of the Ica Age Galciers that once fed the rivers that once made the Taklimakan and Gobi Deserts bloom!
It's improbable, wouldn't you think, that there were not at least a few wanderlust afflicted types, even in Paleolithic times! I know, I know - the Scientific Process MUST be satisfied; but let your imaginations come into play a little more often - like our (Hun)garian commentator, above.
If you've read Jean Auels Books, then think "Jondalar".
Asian nomadic people moved around. There were Sarmatian steppe-dwellers in the Roman armies in western Europe; some say in Britain as heavy cavalry.
Thanks to NAGPRA these ancient finds are turned over to local Indian tribes and re-buried in secret locations without complete scientific study. Like Buhl Woman: "the remains and the artifacts were turned over to the Shoshone-Bannock of Fort Hall over the strenuous objections of many archaeologists, and despite the lack of evidence linking Buhl Woman with this tribe." - wikipedia
Or study is held up for years in court battles (see the Kennewick Man case).
The PC folks will not allow studies of very ancient finds that might show there were other migrations to the New World than the standard Bering Straight theory.
As for NAGPRA, it isn't the end-all be-all and good relations with Native Americans can get you past many thorny issues. Personally, I don't want anyone digging up my ancestors and storing them in boxes on shelves and can see why the tribes object.
All members of Y-Group R1a can trace their Y chromosomes back to one man who is thought to have lived about 10 to 15 thousand years ago, probably in Western Asia. This man belonged to a group of hunter-gatherers that may later have made the Eurasian Steppes north of the Black and Caspian Seas their homeland. Some scientists believe that the male-line ancestors of Y-group R1a were among those responsible for the westwards expansion of the so-called Kurgan culture into Eastern and Central Europe about 5 thousand years ago. These peoples had domesticated the horse and may have been responsible for the spread of the first Indo-European languages into Europe.
Today, the greatest concentration of Y-group R1a members is found in the Slavic peoples of Eastern Europe, where 30 to 50 percent of males belong to this Y-group. Members are also found in Central and Western Asia, India, Pakistan, as well as among some populations of Mongolia and southern Siberia.
This was a strangly poetic intro, I found it to be very beautiful. As a linguist I have been reseaching the IE languages and i think this article has been helpful as a springboard to new research I had not thought of. Thank you.
Tarim Basin Mummies. Wikipedia and NYTimes from 18 Nov 08 have good wrap-ups.
John Frankenstein
Please login or register to participate.