Advertisement

Science Friday
Skeleton of Western man found in ancient Mongolian tomb
DNA from 2,000-year-old skeleton may put Indo-Europeans in East Asia
font_down font_up Text Size
access
Heading East Excavations several years ago at an ancient cemetery in Mongolia uncovered a man's skeleton, including this skull, that has yielded genetic evidence of Indo-Europeans reaching eastern Asia at least 2,000 years ago.Kim, et al.

Dead men can indeed tell tales, but they speak in a whispered double helix.

Consider an older gentleman whose skeleton lay in one of more than 200 tombs recently excavated at a 2,000-year-old cemetery in eastern Mongolia, near China’s northern border. DNA extracted from this man’s bones pegs him as a descendant of Europeans or western Asians. Yet he still assumed a prominent position in ancient Mongolia’s Xiongnu Empire, say geneticist Kyung-Yong Kim of Chung-Ang University in Seoul, South Korea, and his colleagues.

On the basis of previous excavations and descriptions in ancient Chinese texts, researchers suspect that the Xiongnu Empire — which ruled a vast territory in and around Mongolia from 209 B.C. to A.D. 93 — included ethnically and linguistically diverse nomadic tribes. The Xiongnu Empire once ruled the major trading route known as the Asian Silk Road, opening it to both Western and Chinese influences.

Researchers have yet to pin down the language spoken by Xiongnu rulers and political elites, says archaeologist David Anthony of Hartwick College in Oneonta, N.Y. But the new genetic evidence shows that the 2,000-year-old man “was multi-ethnic, like the Xiongnu polity itself,” Anthony remarks.

This long-dead individual possessed a set of genetic mutations on his Y chromosome, which is inherited from paternal ancestors, that commonly appears today among male speakers of Indo-European languages in eastern Europe, central Asia and northern India, Kim’s team reports in an upcoming American Journal of Physical Anthropology. The same man displayed a pattern of mitochondrial DNA mutations, inherited from maternal ancestors, characteristic of speakers of modern Indo-European languages in central Asia, the researchers say.

access
Golden braidGold belt ornaments such as this one lay among items placed in the ancient tomb of a man in eastern Asia whose genetic makeup points to Indo-European ancestry.Kim, et al.

“We don’t know if this 60- to 70-year-old man reached Mongolia on his own or if his family had already lived there for many generations,” says study coauthor Charles Brenner, a DNA analyst based in Oakland, Calif.

Two other skeletons from the Xiongnu cemetery in Duurlig Nars show genetic links to people who live in northeastern Asia, according to Kim’s team. Other team members include Kijeong Kim of Chung-Ang University and Eregzen Gelegdorj of the National Museum of Mongolia in Ulaanbaatar.

The Duurlig Nars man’s genetic signature supports the idea that Indo-European migrations to northeastern Asia started before 2,000 years ago. This notion is plausible, but not confirmed, says geneticist Peter Underhill of Stanford University. Further investigations of Y chromosome mutation frequencies in modern populations will allow for a more precise tracing of the Duurlig Nars man’s geographic roots, Underhill predicts.

Scholars have long sought to trace the origin and spread of related languages now found in Europe, India and other parts of Asia. One hypothesis holds that Indo-European languages proliferated via several waves of expansion and conquest by nomads known as Kurgans who had domesticated horses and thus could travel long distances. In this scenario, Kurgans left a homeland north of the Black Sea, in what’s now Russia, around 6,400 years ago.

Another view holds that farmers from ancient Turkey spread Indo-European tongues as they swallowed up one parcel of land after another, beginning around 9,000 years ago.

Since 1978, discoveries of 2,400- to 4,000-year-old mummified corpses with European features in northwestern China, not far from Mongolia, have fueled the Kurgan hypothesis (SN: 2/25/95, p. 120). Remains of large wheels found with these blond-haired individuals raise the controversial possibility that these foreigners introduced carts and chariots to the Chinese.

Add to those discoveries a report in the September 2009 Human Genetics. Geneticist Christine Keyser of the University of Strasbourg in France and her colleagues found that nine of 26 skeletons previously excavated at 11 Kurgan sites in northeastern Russia possess a Y chromosome mutation pattern thought to mark the eastward expansion of early Indo-Europeans. That same genetic signature characterizes the Duurlig Nars man.

By 2,000 years ago, the easternmost Indo-European languages were probably spoken in northwestern China, Anthony holds. So an Indo-European speaker could have aligned himself with Xiongnu political big shots and earned an eternal resting place in an elite Xiongnu cemetery, in his opinion.

Kim agrees. The Duurlig Nars man’s tomb lies close to the tomb of an especially high-ranking Xiongnu man whom he may have served in some way, he suggests.

Kim’s group plans to extract and study DNA from additional Duurlig Nars skeletons. For now, Anthony remarks, “this new study from Mongolia is important because it adds one more point of light to a largely dark prehistoric sky.”


Found in: Archaeology and Humans

Comments 15
  • Preamble: even though my professional field is literature, I always enjoy browsing your site for the latest scientific news--one has to keep current.
    This article captured my attention for a personal reason. I am originally from Hungary, and this bit of news literally strikes home. Hungarians are very closely related to the Huns with whom they share the same language. For thousands of years, the Huns had a vast empire in Central Asia in the region that is now Mongolia/Northern China. They were referred to by the Chinese as "Xiongnu" (cf. vol. 110 of the Shi Ji by the Chinese historian Sima Qian). The Huns were more Caucasian than Asian in appearance and their language was a Ural-Altaic, more specifically Turkic language. Hun(garian) is an agglutanizing language, very different from Indo-European languages.
    Reading about the various speculations and hypotheses of the scientists quoted above, one wonders why the members of the larger scinefitic community don't speak to one another. I am not an archeologist, but the "mystery" of this find does not puzzle me at all; knowing about my people's origins and history, it all makes sense. Perhaps if the scientists involved would talk to their Hungarian colleagues, it might help shed some light on this particular find. Who knows, they might even be able to read any runic insciptions on the objects found in these tombs. My language, unlike English, has changed very little over the millenia.
    Andrea Bonis Andrea Bonis
    Jan. 29, 2010 at 7:44pm
  • As yet another Hungarian, I have to say I had the same reaction to some of the speculations in this otherwise interesting article.

    The Xiongnu, and related nomadic tribal people are an area worthy of study, but what little remains is in great danger of being erased, and misappropriated.

    I can clearly recall a time when the typical, and debunked Indo-European, etc, speculations were de rigeur, and marred nearly every scientific inquiry into these diverse people. I certainly hope that it is not the case even now...
    szilvia secrets szilvia secrets
    Jan. 30, 2010 at 5:30pm
  • How do we leap from genetics to language? Is a persons language determined by his genes? I'll have to re-read the story of the tower of Babel.
    John Salverda John Salverda
    Jan. 31, 2010 at 10:24am
  • The point I was trying to make is that different scientific fields don't seem to know each other's achievements. Linguists don't talk to archeologists, biologists (DNA studies) don't talk to historians, etc. Not to mention the fact that even scientists working within the same field often fail to pay attention to findings published or circulated in different languages, which is especially true in the case of less mainstream languages. Finally, language/culture/history are obviously intertwined and should be a part of archeological studies. All these fields should be able to enrich each other's findings instead of working in isolation. There's a wealth of information out there, waiting to be shared.
    Andrea Bonis Andrea Bonis
    Jan. 31, 2010 at 2:32pm
  • The skeleton in Archeology's closet is how much certain elements of ancient societies traveled. This travel included the new world.
    Paul Etzler Paul Etzler
    Jan. 31, 2010 at 3:40pm
  • The Hungarians are right in every way! Interdisciplinary Communication would resolve many a 'mystery'; case in point - there have been Isotopic Signature studies done on Bronze and Copper Grave Goods from the now extinct civilizations of the Taklimakan (sp?) Desert, that prove the base metals were mined in the Caucas Mountains.
    If I remember correctly, they were as old a 5500 yaers old (from up to 3500 BCE), and the speculated reason for these Cities abandonment was the complete melting of the Ica Age Galciers that once fed the rivers that once made the Taklimakan and Gobi Deserts bloom!
    It's improbable, wouldn't you think, that there were not at least a few wanderlust afflicted types, even in Paleolithic times! I know, I know - the Scientific Process MUST be satisfied; but let your imaginations come into play a little more often - like our (Hun)garian commentator, above.
    If you've read Jean Auels Books, then think "Jondalar".
    James Staples James Staples
    Jan. 31, 2010 at 4:39pm
  • Hungarians et al. might enjoy the book "Genes, Peoples, and Languages" by Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza! My copy is about ten years old--hope he has or will update!
    Annetha Annetha
    Feb. 1, 2010 at 12:39pm
  • The R1a haplotype on the Y-chromosome is found today most commonly in populations in central Asia, northern India, and with diminishing frequency westward into Europw. I'm of English descent for quite a ways back, but like the man in the Mongolian tomb, I carry the R1a tag.
    Asian nomadic people moved around. There were Sarmatian steppe-dwellers in the Roman armies in western Europe; some say in Britain as heavy cavalry.
    Walter Weller Walter Weller
    Feb. 2, 2010 at 3:58pm
  • In the good old politically correct USA we don't have to trouble ourselves with figuring out these ancient mysteries.
    Thanks to NAGPRA these ancient finds are turned over to local Indian tribes and re-buried in secret locations without complete scientific study. Like Buhl Woman: "the remains and the artifacts were turned over to the Shoshone-Bannock of Fort Hall over the strenuous objections of many archaeologists, and despite the lack of evidence linking Buhl Woman with this tribe." - wikipedia
    Or study is held up for years in court battles (see the Kennewick Man case).
    The PC folks will not allow studies of very ancient finds that might show there were other migrations to the New World than the standard Bering Straight theory.
    m ski m ski
    Feb. 3, 2010 at 7:54am
  • Andrea and szilvia, thanks for sharing. Your comments added additional context to the article and the discussion.
    Jon Hanford Jon Hanford
    Feb. 3, 2010 at 6:53pm
  • Oh people get over it. This is a pop article. They always present everything as new and exciting. I can assure you archaeologists, historians, geneticists, etc do communicate as needed. Archaeology is a very multidisciplinary field.

    As for NAGPRA, it isn't the end-all be-all and good relations with Native Americans can get you past many thorny issues. Personally, I don't want anyone digging up my ancestors and storing them in boxes on shelves and can see why the tribes object.
    lothar of the hill people lothar of the hill people
    Feb. 5, 2010 at 9:42am
  • Decode has the following info on the R1a marker - so clearly that the marker is found in Mongolia is not something new:


    All members of Y-Group R1a can trace their Y chromosomes back to one man who is thought to have lived about 10 to 15 thousand years ago, probably in Western Asia. This man belonged to a group of hunter-gatherers that may later have made the Eurasian Steppes north of the Black and Caspian Seas their homeland. Some scientists believe that the male-line ancestors of Y-group R1a were among those responsible for the westwards expansion of the so-called Kurgan culture into Eastern and Central Europe about 5 thousand years ago. These peoples had domesticated the horse and may have been responsible for the spread of the first Indo-European languages into Europe.

    Today, the greatest concentration of Y-group R1a members is found in the Slavic peoples of Eastern Europe, where 30 to 50 percent of males belong to this Y-group. Members are also found in Central and Western Asia, India, Pakistan, as well as among some populations of Mongolia and southern Siberia.
    Jo Traveller Jo Traveller
    Feb. 6, 2010 at 9:41pm
  • 'Dead men can indeed tell tales, but they speak in a whispered double helix.'

    This was a strangly poetic intro, I found it to be very beautiful. As a linguist I have been reseaching the IE languages and i think this article has been helpful as a springboard to new research I had not thought of. Thank you.
    Layne Prince Layne Prince
    Feb. 6, 2010 at 11:38pm
  • The caucasoid "Tarim Basin Mummies", found in the desert in what is now western China, date back 4000 years or so. Just "google"
    Tarim Basin Mummies. Wikipedia and NYTimes from 18 Nov 08 have good wrap-ups.
    John Frankenstein
    John Frankenstein John Frankenstein
    Mar. 14, 2010 at 7:11pm
  • I agree with Paul Etzler & am awaiting G Mendez' new book.
    kathleen sisco kathleen sisco
    May. 25, 2010 at 4:52pm
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.

Advertisement
Suggested Reading :
seperator
  • Underhill, P., et al. 2009. Separating the Post-Glacial coancestry of European and Asian Y chromosomes within haplogroup R1a. European Journal of Human Genetics. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2009.194.
  • Bower, B. 1995. Indo-European pursuits. Science News 147(8):120.
  • Keyser, C., et al. 2009. Ancient DNA provides new insights into the history of south Siberian Kurgan people. Human Genetics 126:395. doi:10.1007/s00439-009-0683-0.
  • For more information on David Anthony’s research: [Go to]
Citations & References :
seperator
  • Kim, K., et al. 2010. A Western Eurasian Male Is Found in 2000-Year-Old Elite Xiongnu Cemetery in Northeast Mongolia. Am. J. Phys. Anthro. doi:10.1002/ajpa.21242.
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator