Focusing on the heaviest-fished areas can help meet conservation goals

Text Size
SAN DIEGO
— Saving both fish and the fishermen who depend on them appears to come down to
one thing: location, location, location.
Marine protected areas, which currently limit fishing in 1.6
percent of the waters claimed by countries, need to be located in the right
spots to have the maximum effect, researchers report. The work comes in a suite
of papers published online February 22 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and presented at the
annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science on
February 21.
In the Black Sea, for instance, setting aside just 20 to 30
percent of the most affected areas within marine reserves could accomplish
nearly all the goals of protecting the entire reserve, reports a team led by
Benjamin Halpern, a marine scientist at the National Center for Ecological
Analysis and Synthesis in Santa Barbara, Calif. This suggests that precisely
placing the reserves, he said, “can have a dramatic effect on their ability to
improve overall ocean health,” as measured by a suite of factors such as
pollution and fishing.
The number of marine protected areas is soaring. The world’s
governments are nowhere near their stated commitment to protecting between 10
and 30 percent of their waters by 2012, but hundreds of new reserves have
sprung up in recent years.
Not all of them are effective, however. Of 564 small
reserves studied in the Philippines,
for instance, only about one-third were functional, according to work by Richard
Pollnac, an anthropologist at the University
of Rhode Island in Kingston. The rest were not patrolled or
monitored adequately to meet their conservation goals, he says.
Halpern’s work could help illuminate which areas are worth
protecting. The biggest potential gain, he said, comes in areas that are
heavily fished, where setting aside large chunks led to ocean health improvements
of up to 50 percent. In other areas where fishing was less dominant, the
overall ecosystem didn’t improve that much even as reserves were made bigger.
Managing marine protected areas can meet conservation goals
while benefiting fishermen who work nearby, said Andrew Rassweiler, a biologist
at the University of California, Santa
Barbara. He is a coauthor of another new study, which
modeled how fish larvae disperse through the ocean from a marine protected area
in southern California.
A nearby fishery can improve its economic return by as much as 10 percent if it
tracks how and where the larvae grow to big fish it can catch, he reported at
the meeting.
“People fishing can make more money with smaller impacts on
the species being fished,” he said.
Found in: Environment and Science & Society
Please login or register to participate.