Advertisement

Science Friday
Stone Age engraving traditions appear on ostrich eggshells
Standardized designs identified on 60,000-year-old water containers
font_down font_up Text Size
access
Marks of distinctionOstrich eggshell fragments found at a rock shelter in southern Africa indicate that people living there roughly 60,000 years ago used these eggshells as water containers. In an early example of symbolic communication, the people engraved standardized geometric designs on the shells that probably indicated group identity. P.-J. Texier, Diepkloof project

Long before human communication evolved into incessant tapping on computer keys, people scratched on eggshells.

Don’t laugh—researchers say a cache of ostrich eggshells engraved with geometric designs demonstrates the existence of a symbolic communication system around 60,000 years ago among African hunter-gatherers.

The unusually large sample of 270 engraved eggshell fragments, mostly excavated over the past several years at Diepkloof Rock Shelter in South Africa, displays two standard design patterns, according to a team led by archaeologist Pierre-Jean Texier of the University of Bordeaux 1 in Talence, France. Each pattern enjoyed its own heyday between approximately 65,000 and 55,000 years ago, the investigators report in a paper to be published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Researchers already knew that the Howiesons Poort culture, which engraved the eggshells, engaged in other symbolic practices, such as engraving designs into pieces of pigment, that were considered to have been crucial advances in human behavioral evolution. But the Diepkloof finds represent the first archaeological sample large enough to demonstrate that Stone Age people created design traditions, at least in their engravings, Texier says.

Evidence of intentionally produced holes in several Diepkloof eggshells indicates that ancient people made what amounted to canteens out of them, a practice that researchers have documented among modern hunter-gatherers in southern Africa.

The engraved patterns probably identified the eggshells as the property of certain groups or communities, Texier proposes.

“The Diepkloof engravings were clearly made for visual display and recognized as such by a large audience comprising members of a community, and probably members of related communities,” comments University of Bordeaux 1 archaeologist Francesco d’Errico, who was not involved in the new study.

D’Errico participated in the recent unearthing of 13 pieces of engraved pigment at South Africa’s Blombos Cave dating to between 100,000 and 75,000 years ago. Along with perforated sea shells and other personal ornaments previously excavated in Africa and the Middle East, these discoveries show that items holding symbolic meaning were made more than 60,000 years ago by both modern humans and Neandertals.

Even more exciting, according to archaeologist Curtis Marean of Arizona State University in Tempe, is the presence of drinking spouts in the South African eggshells. Water containers opened a new world of travel across arid regions for ancient people, he notes.

“The ability to carry and store water is a breakthrough technological advance, and here we have excellent evidence for it very early,” Marean says. “Wow!”

Eggshell fragments from the oldest sediment layers at Diepkloof display a hatched-band motif. These engravings consist of two long, parallel lines intersected by varying numbers of short lines. Some specimens contain one hatched band, while others display remnants of two or three. Engravers always fashioned parallel lines first and then inserted regularly spaced intersecting lines, Texier says.

Eggshells from younger soil layers at Diepkloof contain patterns consisting of deeply engraved, parallel lines that sometimes converge or intersect. One eggshell fragment from these layers exhibits a different pattern—slightly curved horizontal lines that cross a central, vertical line.

Of the many Howiesons Poort sites in southern Africa that have yielded ostrich eggshells, only Diepkloof shows evidence of stylistic engraving traditions, Texier says.


Found in: Archaeology and Humans

Comments 8
  • These eggshell scratches are quite obviously crude decorative patterns, not "symbolic communication" -- and given the absolute political imperative of something in Africa or the Middle East always predating anything in Europe, the dating should be regarded with some suspicion as well.

    We are told that progress from no graphical art to scratches demonstrates a revolution in human cognition -- if it happens in Africa. Then what is the evolutionary meaning of the incredible explosion of lifelike sculpture and painting that appears out of nowhere in Europe 45,000 years ago?

    No meaning whatsoever -- that might contradict the "anti-racist, anti-colonialist" Leftist dogma dominating archaeology today.
    Pauline P Pauline P
    Mar. 1, 2010 at 9:21pm
  • We have two choices: either they did it to be more beautiful (as decorative designs) or they did it as symbols and codes.
    Literally, in either case, they certainly knew a lot more about beauty and comunications throught it than we ever imagined. We shall not forget that beauty and comunications are both much contemporary to ourselves than to them back there.
    Discovering a civilization 40 thousand years older than the egipcians and babilones certainly will light a brand new spot on the brights of Science we use to call modern and precise.
    I would yet consider that human race has been existed before in Atlantida, after a finding like that to be true.
    (I personally believe on the arguments here shown, just to add).
    ketinunkantim ketinunkantim
    Mar. 2, 2010 at 2:10am
  • I wonder if this is a simple case? Humans tend to rework natural materials to make them "mine," so to speak. The eggshell markings could be a ring like the bands around an Easter egg (with a contemporaneous meaning, of course -- or no meaning beyond expressing that any remaining bird cooties have been rubbed off.)

    Looking for signs, symbols or codes seems like an arbitrary expression of observer bias, rather than description of what's there.
    grikdog grikdog
    Mar. 2, 2010 at 12:19pm
  • The published paper may explain in more detail how the researchers concluded that these incised lines were a form of communication. But I agree there may be a tendency to read more into this sensationall find than is warranted.

    What I find most interesting, aside from the etched patterns, is the beautiful coloring. The article makes no mention of this. Ostrich eggs are naturally nearly white. Did these people paint or stain them? If so, I think that is just as interesting as the hatched patterns. Is that a blue pigment? Or is it actually black (soot perhaps or stain from the matrix), and just seems to be blue in the photo reproduction?

    Pauline P-- ...political imperative?...leftist dogma? IMHO, with all due respect, your comment would be less constructively addressed by an archeologist than it would be by a qualified mental health professional.

    ketinunkantim--There is a huge difference between a culture and a civilization. No one is claiming that the people who produced these artifacts were "civilized", that is, engaged in an organized urban ("civil") society. What is fascinating is that these fragments indicate very early evidence for the kind of thinking that would be considered a culture.
    The best evidence for the source of the Atlantis tale is that it may allude to the Minoan civilization that was essentially destroyed by the eruption of the Thera volcano around 1500 BC. (You've got the time scales slightly mixed up by several tens of thousands of years.) On the other hand, the tale could very well be purely mythological.
    Steve Palmer Steve Palmer
    Mar. 2, 2010 at 1:08pm
  • Steve makes an interesting point regarding pigmentation. The incised lines are paler than the shell surface, suggesting that they were engraved after pigmentation occurred. The contrast would have allowed the engraver to see his developing design. Had the shells been engraved while still white and pigmented afterwards, the rougher surfaces of the incised lines might have absorbed the pigment more strongly than the smoother, unaltered surface. That technique could have constituted an alternate tradition. After all, white lines on a white shell would be pointless. Of course, none of this proves that pigment was intentionally applied, but it looks like human agency to me.
    Pamela Harlow Pamela Harlow
    Mar. 3, 2010 at 10:53am
  • Pauline P, you're absolutely right.

    Walter Weller
    Walter Weller Walter Weller
    Mar. 3, 2010 at 8:05pm
  • And so long ago; two parallel lines with regularly spaced intersecting lines. Beautiful. From the Minoan Double Axe (double axis) culture, back to the Incan double axis, two roads, one through the mountain, one by the sea, connected by intersecting roads. Geometry rules through geology. It really is back to the future.
    kathleen sisco kathleen sisco
    Mar. 7, 2010 at 2:20pm
  • Pauline P, art has been foound in Europe going back beyond 45,000 years. It is now becoming clear that Neanderthals were making art as well. Nobody is being pc. If the evidence shows art from Africa going back 60,000 years so what.
    Like it not our ancestors came from Africa. I don't have a problem with that but others do. I have no time for them and will continue to marvel at what our ancestors were doing whereever they may have been.
    Amanda Peters Amanda Peters
    Mar. 10, 2010 at 11:11am
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.

Advertisement
Citations & References :
seperator
  • Texier, P.-J., et al. 2010. A Howiesons Poort tradition of engraving ostrich eggshell containers dated to 60,000 years ago at Diepkloof rock Shelter, South Africa. in press, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.0913047107.
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator