- :: Atom & Cosmos
- :: Body & Brain
- :: Earth
- :: Environment
- :: Genes & Cells
- :: Humans
- :: Life
- :: Matter & Energy
- :: Molecules
- :: Science & Society
- :: Other Topics
- :: Science News For Kids
Researchers have found what may be the earliest evidence of multicellular life on Earth. Large fossils uncovered in 2.1 billion-year-old rock from Gabon, in western Africa, appear to be incipient examples of macroscopic life in what was then a sea of single-celled microbes.
Scientists believe that multicellular life really took off much later, in the great expansion of animal body plans known as the Cambrian explosion 545 million years ago.
“The discovery is fantastic because it shows the existence of multicellular fauna 1.5 billion years earlier than what we know,” says team leader Abderrazak El Albani, a sedimentologist and paleobiologist at the University of Poitiers in France. “This is important to understand the evolution of life on Earth.”
Some researchers have suggested multicellular organisms arose as early as 1.6 billion years ago, but the evidence is controversial. El Albani and his colleagues were thus surprised to find large fossils in the newly excavated ancient Gabonese rocks. So far, the team has collected over 250 specimens that range in size from 1 to 12 centimeters.
Using detailed X-ray imaging called microtomography, the team created three-dimensional images of the fossils inside and out. The organisms had flat, round, soft bodies, with slits around the edges and complex, patterned folds inside. The creatures belong to new species that have never been described, the team reports in the July 1 Nature.
Other researchers agree that the large size, thickness, and three-dimensionality of the organisms suggest that they were, indeed, multicellular. “There does seem to be something more than just a clonal colony of bacteria,” says paleobiologist Philip Donoghue of the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom.
El Albani and his team believe the complex patterns and folding mean that cells must have coordinated their growth through chemical signaling, like all multicellular organisms do. The fossils could even be the first examples of eukaryotes, cells with membrane-bound nuclei, according to the team.
But since actual cells were long gone from the sediments, the team had to prove these fossils were not simply mineral formations that looked like animals.
Pyrite, a sulfur-containing mineral also known as fool’s gold, filled the fossils, providing evidence that sulfate-breathing bacteria had eaten away at living tissue. Carbon and sulfur isotopes also confirmed the fossils' organic origins.
Further analysis showed that the fossils couldn't have been more recent organisms that burrowed deep into sediments, because the surrounding rock was the same inside and outside the organisms’ folds.
Rock chemistry indicates the organisms lived about 30 to 40 meters deep in sea water. They likely breathed oxygen, which by that time had been building up in the oceans and atmosphere for 350 million years. Donoghue says it’s exciting that scientists are “edging back” the fossil record toward this so-called “great oxidation event” 2.5 billion years ago.
The research team plans to do more experiments to determine how these organisms lived and how to further categorize them.
Found in: Earth Science

-
Maxmen, A. 2008. Life explodes twice. Science News 173 (Jan. 26): 61.
[Go to] - Perkins, S. 2006. Remains may be an evolutionary relic. Science News 169 (May 20): 318.
[Go to] - Travis, J. 2004. Gassing up: Oxygen's rise may have promoted complex life. Science News 165 (Feb. 7): 85.
[Go to]
- El Albani, A. et al. 2010. Large colonial organisms with coordinated growth in oxygenated environments 2.1 Gyr ago. Nature 466 (July 1): 100. Doi: 10.1038/nature09166
- Changing one of nature's constants
- Light-harvesting complexes do it themselves
- DVDs don’t turn toddlers into vocabulary Einsteins
- String theory entangled
- Microbe’s survival manual



For example, mosquitoes that bites us put venom in us to control us since they cannot enter our body like worms of the earth do. Roaches that we live with control most of the population. Since roaches eat fecal matter, they concoct venom that is very powerful. Wherever the roaches penetrate the person's body, a rash develops. This place where the rash develops become a center point, like where you put a computer chip, for the roaches to control the affected person.That person is controlled during her or his lifetime if the victim doesn't take appropriate antidote. The scientists haven't made any antidote yet because they are infected as well and they are zombies of bacteria.
Researchers do not work for people. Since anyone born on earth is a zombie of bacteria.
That is why bacteria living in the rich people rule researchers. Every resource on earth are in the hand of the parasitic rich. They have nothing, not even their children, which bacteria use any way they see fit. Rich people don't love their kids. They "care" for their kids. The word care contains the name of ra and re, the bacterial greek and arabic parasites that rule earth and name the earth after themselves. Bugs, parasites, or bacteria cannot love. They use the word to look human since they exchange place with human. But they can "care". That is why kings and queens and all leaders breed only to carry the dynasty just like bugs do. They can kill their kids for the dynasty, just like bugs do.
So researchers are ra and re parasitic minions.
Since you yourself have more than likely consumed yogurt at some point in your childhood (which contains bacteia) and since you yourself were a toddler, putting everything new in your mouth, then you are also a zombie to bacteria, being controlled by them.
So how can I believe anything you say as the truth? You too are being controlled, typing into your computer exactly the things that 'they' tell you to.
Please login or register to participate.